Love and Marriage in Geoffrey Chaucers Canterbury Tales

Love and Marriage in Geoffrey Chaucers Canterbury recordsLove and Marriage Insanities devising sense out of fuck and marriage ideals is not an easy task, oddly as humanity actions in emotional circumstances do not follow any(prenominal) logic. It is a fact that has been proven consistently all over time, across cultures and is in addition corroborated by many of the stories within Geoffrey Chaucers Canterbury Tales. In particular, The Knights Tale and The Millers Tale, that take place in two different social unbendingtings, subscribe to fun of conventional beliefs or so approve and marriage in the context of commit of determine such as bravery, street smartness, morality, and faithfulness. Through their mends, the narrators styles, and the contrast they represent up surrounded by cherished and practiced values, the two tales highlight that human behavior in romantic situations is a great deal unpredictable, crazy and colored by ones social class, stomaching that th ere is no such thing as a model love or marriage.Although The Knights Tale plot is set in the halo of honor, chivalry and courtesy, the storys events and the characters actions show the silliness in how they breed love. As an example, the two cousins, Arcite and Palamon, are ready to kill each separate for a cleaning woman uncomplete of them has talked to. After escaping from the prison, Palamon discovers Arcites love for Emily and angrily challenges Arcite to a fight. Arcite responds, And I denounce all covenants that stand / Or are alleged, amongst you and me / remember love is free / And I will love her I defy your might. (Chaucer 46) It is ironic that Arcite, who as a knight should keep his enunciate and follow principles, is willing to break his earlier oath not to suffice in the way of his cousins love pursuit. Arcite justifies breaking his vow because as a free person he is not constrained whom he loves. He is willing to do whatever it takes to get Emily and doesnt car e how strong Palamon is. stock-still though people can be cast irrationally in matters involving love, some(prenominal) Palamon and Arcite are being stupid in this instance. Neither of them knows what Emily thinks. Isnt it exemplary love a two-way relationship? Whom are they courting and quarreling about? are they willing to go to the extremes of killing each other for a woman who at this moment doesnt represent anything other than an image, symbol or loot that theyve seen from a distance? What makes this even more bizarre is that Emily doesnt even motive to get married. She prays to Goddess Diana, That I would be virgin all my life sentence, / And would be neither mistress, no, nor wife. / of thy company, / A huntress walk the wood shores wild. (Chaucer 65) Emily doesnt identical a mans company, prefers hunting and doesnt want to sweep up or bear children. This exposes the foolishness of what Arcite and Palamon were up to, even though they supposedly follow all the ideals of aristocratic class such as bravery, honor, connect and courtly love.The Knights Tale depiction of love is strongly influenced by its narrator, a knight, and his humansview. In the Prologue, the narrator is introduced as someone who followed chivalry, Truth, honour, generousness and courtesy. (Chaucer 4) Since in a knights world, bravery and somatogenic fights resolve disputes, it is no winder that in his story, a tournament clash is the best way to settle the rivalry between Emilys two suitors. She is no dampen than a trophy to be won in a contest. The King Theseus treats Emily, in the traditions of the aristocratic class, as a gift to win peace and harmony. Even though she apparently doesnt have any say, her suitors try to woo her with flowery language as per their traditions, custom and code of conduct. As an example, Arcite, while in prison, describes his feelings towards Emily to Palamon, And with a deep and wretched sigh he said / The freshness of her beauty strikes m e dead / Unless I at least see her day by day, / I am but dead (Chaucer 33) Arcite is using fancy language to say that sanatorium die if he doesnt the object of his love every day. Although the story represents love in flowery terms and as a bravery contest, reflecting the narrators perspective, the plot and characters actions speak of the irrational twists and turns in romantic pursuits.In contrast to the attired language and high-minded principles of the knights world, The Millers Tale depicts romantic situations in vulgar and laughable tones, and in the process, makes fun of conventional dos and donts about love and marriage. As an example, the way Alison handles her two suitors, Nicholas and Absalon, is not only hilarious but also a not so subtle middle-class snub of the upper-class imposed view about love. When Alisons husband leaves for work, Nicholas tries to woo her with aggressive cozy advances. In response, she reacts, Swearing shed love him, with a solemn stipulatio n / To be at his disposal / When she could spy an opportunity. (Chaucer 91) She is so attracted to the street-smart Nicholas that she has no problems in being at his disposal. She just wants to wait for the right opportunity when it is caoutchouc for her to cheat on her husband. In marginal contrast to falling for the material advances of Nicholas, Alison refuses the dignified courtship of the parish clerk Absalon. Not only does she spurn his affection, she does so by tricking him to kiss her genitals. After this trickery, Teehee she laughed, and clapped the, window to / Off went poor Absalon sadly through the dark. (Chaucer 103) Alisons contrasting responses, towards her suitors, highlight the qualities, a middle-class girl like her, admires the most street smartness, boldness and physical attraction represented by Nicholas. On the other hand, she humiliates Absalon, making a mockery of his gentlemanly approaches and smart words. Further, by being part of an extra-marital affa ir, she is being unfaithful to her husband. She also participates in Nicholass scheme to deceive her naive husband, that ends up making him a laughing-stock of the town. When can fell from the boat and no one listened to him, Alison and Nicholas told the town people, That he was mad, almost sort of nonsense about Nowels Flood All started laughing at this lunacy. (Chaucer 105) This episode, in addition to her infidelity, was Alisons payback for her marriage with the much older carpenter and his extraordinary protective nature. Maybe, she was married to him because he was rich, a practice that was super acid in arranged marriages in the medieval middle class.The Millers Tale narrators potable and middle-class perspective shapes his story in direct, crude, and vulgar terms. In the Prologue, he proudly states that One shouldnt be too inquisitive in life / Either about Gods secrets or ones wife. /Gods plenty all you could desire / better not enquire. (Chaucer 88) Through these words, the narrator expresses his view that men shouldnt care about their wives or Gods private affairs. There are lots of women in this world to choose from and men shouldnt ask about the rest. Maybe the narrator has promiscuous morals. Or, his middle-class outlook conditions him to talk frankly about subjects like physical sex and infidelity. In the narrators real world, instant gratification is more applicatory than high-minded principles or morals. Its also an environment that rewards street smartness and land grab mindset of Nicholas and looks down upon the poetic verbiage of Absalon. In any case, the narrators choice of words and the substance of his tale sets up a profound contrast with the polished language and plot of the Knights Tale.Although the two tales, set in different social contexts, are influenced by their narrators style and language, both stories public eye that there is no universal standard one can use to judge human actions in love and marriage. The Knights Tale , despite its depictions of idolized values such as honor, bravery, and courteousness, boils love down to essentially a competition instead of a two-way relationship. The Millers Tale, despite its vulgarity and crudeness, presents the day-to-day happenings in love and marriage in ordinary folks lives, in stark contrast to the ivory tower world of the aristocratic class. Both stories, however, confirm that human behavior in love and marriage circumstances is often moody, irrational and erratic. It is, therefore, foolish to make predictions about human behavior in such matters where ones heart rules the brain.