.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Machiavelli vs Islamic political thought :: essays research papers

Machiavelli vs Islamic Political sentimentNiccolo Machiavelli was a political realist. He thought there were certain skills and characteristics essential to become a political ruler. In his spring, The Prince, Machiavelli gives advice on how to be a successful prince, or ruler. Successful is partly based on how muscular a ruler was during his lifetime (reign), but largely based on how much the prince affected the lives, through laws or societal norms, of future generations. Machiavelli was principally interested in attaining and keeping political power. He believed people were inherently selfish and would, by nature, not respect the law or work for the common good, without civil virtues. The solitary(prenominal) way to control these human urges was to shanghai national pride and mutual respect for all citizens of a claim. The dissimilitude in Machiavellian thought, up to this point in history, from other philosophers was he believed political authority was no longer justifi ed by sacred or spiritual doctrines. Although Machiavelli believed this to be true, he still k revolutionary it was important for citizens to assign a commitment for the common good, through national pride and respect. some other aspect of differing thought up to this point in time was Machiavelli knew promoting civic virtue in citizens needed to be coupled with the pursuit of man-to-man liberty.Machiavelli, in his writings, talks about several different arrive ats of authorities. Specifically, monarchies, aristocracies, and democracies. He was able-bodied to pick apart monarchies, establishing the difference between new and old monarchies. The new monarchies are the hard ones to maintain, because people are not susceptible to change, in fact they almost revolt against it, unless the new ruler can perk up good on his word and keep his promises. Machiavellis preferred form of government was the republic. A republic is a mixing of the three governments aforementioned. Having t he government made up of the nobles, the elite, and the commoners establishes a set of checks and balances against one another. No one, particular group will be able to take control of the state again. And in fact, the people (citizens) tend to have more leverage than each other faction. Machiavelli knew people were mainly concerned about their property and good being of their family. He also knew the governments job was to harbor both, in addition to helping the people prosper and follow their hearts, if you will. Machiavelli believed only certain people could become rulers, because it took a special sort of person.

No comments:

Post a Comment