Science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Hard Times by Charles Dicken

The nineteenth century was a clock of massive agitate socially, politically and scientifically. This time saw the rise of Imperialism and of the industrial Revolution in Britain, seeing massive changes in the way industry was run. Also during this time the literary movements of wild-eyedism and Victorianism emerged. Romanticism dealt with the issues of reality versus illusion, childhood and man versus nature. The commencement book I will examine in this essay, bloody shame Shelleys Frankenstein, comes from this literary cessation and focuses on the man versus nature stand, namely the theme of scientific development and its contrast to nature. The second book I will look at in this essay comes from the Victorian period of the 19th century. This period saw the rise of the Industrial Revolution and of big social and political change. Hard Times by Charles Dickens deals with these issues precise closely, focussing mainly on the rise of industry in Britain and its cause on the pe ople of Britain. Both of these sassys challenge the social, political and scientific developments of the 19th century, namely the advent of scientific discipline and technology.Mary Shelleys Frankenstein has become nearly a myth in our culture it so deeply probes the incarnate cultural psyche and our fear of science and progress. Frankenstein is our cultures intimately penetrating literary analysis of the psychology of modern scientific man, of the dangers inbred in scientific research, and the exploitation of nature and of the female implicit in(predicate) in a technological society (Mellor, 198838). The interesting thing about Frankenstein is that in that location can be multiple readings of the text. It can be seen as a conservative criticism of science, a Promethean belief of the unlimited progress of science, the womens rightist anti-female principle angle to the story, even a religion versus science story. What I will explore through this essay is each of these readin gs and shed near light on this wonderful novel. The value of Mary Shelleys novel lies not in presenting a clear morale but further the readers to make up their own (members.aon.at.htm). The most obvious and well-known theory of the story of Frankenstein is that of a warning to the dangers of science Mary Shelleys implicit warning against possible dangers inherent in the technological developments of modern science (Mellor, 1988114). Shelley was very interested in ... ... David Copperfield and Hard Times, New York Macmillan Press.6.Small, C. (1972) Mary Shelleys Frankenstein-Tracing the Myth, Pittsburgh University Of Pittsburgh Press.7.Shelley, M. (1996) Frankenstein A Norton Critical Edition, New York W.W. Norton & Company.8.Tambing, J. (1995) Dickens, Violence and The Modern State, London Macmillan Press.9.Ashbury, M (2001) Representation of Industrialization in Dickens Hard Times Online. accessible http//www.colourpurple.com Accessed 25th April 2005.10.Allingham, P. (2000) C harles Dickens Hard Times for These Times as an Industrial Novel Online. Available http//www.victoriaweb.com Accessed 25th April 2005.11.Rohrmoser, A. (2004) The Origin of a Myth Mary Shelleys Novel Frankenstein Online. Available http//membersaon.at.htm Accessed 25th April 2005.12.Oldham, R. (2000) Charles Dickens Hard Times Romantic Tragedy of Proletariat Propaganda Online. Available http//www.pillowrock.com Accessed 25th April 2005.13.Frankenstein a science-fiction novel or a scientific fiction? Online, (2001). Available http//gala.univ-perp.fr Accessed 25th April 2005.